Knowing yourself first

Before you ever ask other people how you lead, there is a quieter question worth sitting with. How do you see yourself? A leadership self-assessment starts there — not with colleagues, not with a panel, but with you and an honest look in the mirror.

It sounds simple. It is not. Most of us are surprisingly poor witnesses to our own behaviour, and the higher you rise, the fewer people are willing to correct your view. At Catalyst, the self-version of our profiling work is often where the real growth begins, because everything else builds on it.

Let me explain what it is, when it makes sense, and why doing it alone is far harder — and more revealing — than it looks.

What a leadership self-assessment really is

A leadership self-assessment is a structured way of rating your own behaviour against the dimensions that actually predict effective leadership. Not a personality quiz. Not a horoscope. A validated instrument that asks you to score how you typically act — how you handle conflict, make decisions, give feedback, hold pressure, build relationships.

The structure is what makes it useful. Left to our own devices, we reflect in loops. We replay the meeting that went well and quietly skip the one that did not. A good instrument breaks that loop. It forces you to consider dimensions you would rather not, and to put a number on things you usually keep vague.

That discipline is the value. You cannot work on what you will not name.

Why do it on your own first

The colleague-feedback version of leadership profiling is powerful — I run plenty of it. But there are sound reasons to begin with a solo leadership self-assessment.

Sometimes the timing is wrong for a full multi-rater process. A leader is new in role and does not yet have colleagues who have seen enough of them to comment fairly. Sometimes the appetite is not there yet — someone is curious about development but not ready to be that exposed. And sometimes the goal is genuinely internal: clarifying your own values, your own sense of how you want to lead, before you measure how others receive it.

A solo assessment is also the natural first half of a longer journey. Score yourself first. Then, later, gather the colleague feedback and compare. The gap between the two is where the most useful conversations live.

The honesty problem

Here is the catch nobody mentions. The hardest person to assess honestly is yourself.

We over-rate the qualities we wish we had and under-notice the ones we dislike in others but quietly share. We grade ourselves on intention — “I meant well” — while everyone else grades us on impact. A leadership self-assessment only works if you are willing to answer as you actually behave on a difficult Tuesday, not as you behave in the story you tell about yourself.

This is exactly why we use validated tools rather than a casual checklist. A well-built instrument is designed to catch the flattering self-portrait. It asks the same underlying thing from several angles, so the version of you that is performing for the test starts to slip, and a truer pattern shows through.

I often tell leaders: answer fast, answer first-instinct, and resist editing. The score you give before you start managing your own image is usually the accurate one.

What good tools reveal that guessing cannot

The instruments we use at Catalyst — the Leadership Circle Profile chief among them — do something a simple “rate yourself one to ten” can never do. They connect your visible behaviour to the assumptions underneath it.

You might score yourself low on delegation. Fine. But the better tools ask why. Is it a skills gap, or a quiet belief that no one will do it as well as you? Is your reluctance to give hard feedback about kindness, or about your own discomfort with conflict? Surface behaviour is the symptom. The assumption driving it is the thing worth working on.

That is the difference between a self-assessment that entertains you for an afternoon and one that changes how you lead. The first tells you what you do. The second helps you understand why — which is the only place lasting change starts. This is the same depth we bring to executive coaching, and the two work beautifully together.

How Catalyst runs a solo assessment

The process is light to set up and deliberately structured to debrief.

You complete a validated self-assessment instrument — honestly, quickly, without overthinking each item. The results come back as a profile rather than a single score, mapping your strengths and your reactive tendencies across the dimensions that matter.

Then we debrief together. This is the part that turns data into insight. On your own, a self-assessment report is easy to rationalise away — you can explain every uncomfortable number. In a coaching conversation, the patterns get harder to dodge and far more useful to explore. We look at what surprised you, what you defended too quickly, and what you already suspected but had never written down.

From there, we build something practical: two or three areas to work on, and a way to track whether anything actually shifts.

When to graduate to the full 360

A leadership self-assessment is a complete and worthwhile piece of work on its own. It is also, very often, the doorway to more.

Once you know how you see yourself, the obvious next question is whether others see you the same way. That is when a full 360 leadership assessment earns its place — five colleagues, structured and anonymous, telling you where your self-view and your reputation match and where they diverge. The leaders who do both, in that order, tend to get the most from each. They have already done the inner work, so the outer feedback lands as information rather than as a threat.

Self-awareness first. External feedback second. Lasting change third.

Start with the mirror

There is a particular kind of courage in assessing yourself before anyone else does. No one is making you. There is no boss requiring it, no performance review forcing it. You are choosing to look clearly at your own leadership simply because you want to be better at it.

That instinct — to know yourself first — is the foundation everything else stands on. If you are ready to take an honest, structured look at how you lead, a leadership self-assessment is where I would start you. The mirror is generous. You just have to be willing to look.

To read more on self-awarness as a leader: https://hbr.org/2018/01/self-awareness-can-help-leaders-more-than-an-mba-can

---